🔗 Share this article

Critics have accused the German leader, Friedrich Merz, of using what they call “risky” discourse regarding immigration, after he supported “massive” expulsions of people from cities – and asserted that anyone with daughters would agree with his position.

Firm Response

Merz, who took office in May vowing to combat the rise of the right-wing AfD party, this week reprimanded a journalist who asked whether he wished to modify his strict comments on immigration from last week considering broad condemnation, or apologise for them.

“I don’t know if you have kids, and female children among them,” remarked to the journalist. “Consult your girls, I suspect you’ll get a quite unambiguous answer. I have nothing to withdraw; to the contrary I stress: we must change the situation.”

Opposition Backlash

Left-wing parties charged the chancellor of emulating extremist parties, whose assertions that women and girls are being singled out by migrants with sexual violence has become a global far-right rallying cry.

Green party politician Ricarda Lang, charged that Merz of promoting a dismissive statement for young women that ignored their genuine policy priorities.

“Perhaps ‘the daughters’ are also displeased with Friedrich Merz showing concern about their freedoms and safety when he can leverage them to justify his entirely regressive policies?” she posted on social media.

Security Focus

Friedrich Merz said his priority was “safety in common areas” and highlighted that provided that it could be guaranteed “will the conventional political parties regain faith”.

He received backlash last week for remarks that opponents claimed implied that multiculturalism itself was a challenge in the nation’s metropolitan areas: “Naturally we still have this challenge in the city environment, and which is why the interior minister is now working to enable and implement expulsions on a very large scale,” stated during a visit to Brandenburg outside Berlin.

Discrimination Allegations

The leader of the Greens in Brandenburg charged the chancellor of stoking ethnic bias with his comment, which sparked minor protests in several urban centers at the weekend.

“This is concerning when ruling parties try to portray people as a problem based on their appearance or origin,” remarked.

SPD politician Natalie Pawlik of the SPD, coalition partners in the current administration, said: “Migration cannot be stigmatised with simplistic or demagogic kneejerk reactions – this fragments the community even further and in the end helps the undesirable elements as opposed to fostering solutions.”

Party Dynamics

The chancellor’s political alliance turned in a underwhelming 28.5 percent performance in the recent federal election compared to the anti-immigration, anti-Muslim Alternative für Deutschland with its unprecedented 20.8 percent result.

Since then, the far right party has matched with the CDU/CSU, exceeding their support in certain surveys, during voter fears around migration, criminal activity and financial downturn.

Background Information

Merz rose to the top of his organization pledging a stricter approach on immigration than the longtime CDU chancellor Angela Merkel, opposing her “we can do it” motto from the migrant crisis a previous decade and attributing to her part of the blame for the growth of the far-right party.

He has fostered an sometimes more populist tone than the former chancellor, famously accusing “little pashas” for frequent destruction on New Year’s Eve and asylum seekers for taking dental visits at the detriment of German citizens.

Party Planning

The CDU met on the weekend to formulate a approach ahead of several local polls next year. The AfD maintains strong leads in several eastern states, approaching a historic 40% support.

The chancellor maintained that his political group was in agreement in barring collaboration in administration with the AfD, a approach typically called as the “protection”.

Internal Dissent

Nevertheless, the latest survey results has spooked various CDU members, prompting a handful of party officials and consultants to suggest in recently that the policy could be untenable and harmful in the long run.

Those disagreeing argue that while the relatively new far-right party, which internal security services have designated as rightwing extremist, is capable of snipe from the sidelines without having to implement the difficult decisions governing requires, it will benefit from the incumbent deficit affecting many developed countries.

Research Findings

Researchers in the country have determined that mainstream parties such as the CDU were gradually enabling the right-wing to establish the discourse, unwittingly normalizing their proposals and disseminating them more widely.

Even though Merz declined using the phrase “firewall” on the recent occasion, he maintained there were “essential disagreements” with the AfD which would make partnership impossible.

“We recognize this difficulty,” he stated. “From now on also demonstrate clearly and unequivocally the AfD’s positions. We will distinguish ourselves explicitly and very explicitly from them. {Above all